![]() The intervention group also had statistically significant lower injury rates for trunk (0.07 vs 0.51 P =. 007), lower extremity injuries (0.68 vs 1.4 P =. In the intervention group, injury rates per 1000 athlete-exposures were lower than those in the control group, with statistical significance, for overall injuries (0.95 vs 2.16 P =. They included an analysis of the type of exposure (match or training), injury location in the body, and type of injury (acute or overuse).ĭuring the 9-month season, 23 (19%) of the 121 players included in the study sustained a total of 31 injuries (14 in the intervention group and 17 in the control group). The secondary outcome was any injury to the lower extremity (foot, ankle, lower leg, knee, thigh, groin, and hip). The primary outcome was any injury to the athletes. The authors conducted an injury surveillance program during a 9-month season. Seven teams were allocated to the intervention group (80 players mean age 13.5 years), and 4 teams were allocated to the control group (41 players mean age 15.2 years). The authors randomized 11 teams of the same club. #Fifa 11 plus warm up trial#Randomized controlled trial Level of evidence, 1. The FIFA 11+ program is effective in reducing the rates of injury in male basketball players. The FIFA 11+ program has not been evaluated in basketball. Recently, structured training programs for sports injury prevention ("The 11" and "The 11+") have been validated in soccer. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |